It Came from Outer Space - DivX Version (Normal Quality), iPod/iPhone Version
|
IMDB rating: 6.60 Plot: John Putnam and Ellen watch a great fireball going down near a mine. Both are the only ones, who believe the “thing” not to be a meteor but an alien starship. In the following days, people disappear and return, obviously being manipulated in a strange way. After a while, the sheriff becomes distrustful. He and his men enter the mine. But Putnam hopes to reach a peaceful solution and enters the starship … |
Available versions:
DivX Version (Normal Quality), iPod/iPhone Version
Actors: Carlson Richard,Drake Charles,Sawyer Joe,Johnson Russell,Brooks Ralph,Buster Budd,Carson Robert,Davenport Ned,Dearing Edgar,Dexter Alan,Eldredge George,Fix Paul,Haupt Whitey,Horror,Sci-Fi,Thriller,
evolution,lab designed or made from a supreme being,or are we a design of god?
with all considered what is the most frequented idea of where humans came from. our chromosome make up says we are a blend of several but none of the others,if this is so there should be no missing link with no link we suddenly appeared then right,or were we made as slaves for visitors from outer space who designed us from there knowledge for there use and we got out of hand, what is the explaination of all taken in consideration of being true.
where did we come from
why do we have a compound chromosome where our relative have none, we have 23 where they have 24 which ,makes it impossible to interbreed true, but we evolved away from this right then how did we get a more proper word fused chromosome
im sorry but there is still conflicting reports of all answers so far.yes i know fossils also but there is no missing link found to date of where we went total ape to man now is there so far we just suddenly appeared,and the dna says something else also of our chromosomes and make up
if we evolved from apes we are a blend of then and now true of the same family tree so far is what is said . dna we share with apes except 50% of the amino acids from the little differrences in chromosomes, we have 23 they have 24 how did we evolve from them and change our dna during the time,evolution doesnt do what was done.
do more research!
look all i want to know is the train of thought not what someone has told you to believe, there are contradistions every where for alien visitors lab experiments and evolution with natural selection, by this we are as much kin to cat as we are apes which life here came from here we should all share basic roots,my questions relates to ok all things considered why the heck is man even here then, natural selection doesnt say it all evolution doesnt religion doesnt, not even little green men with big round eyes. there is nothing to prove any is totally right or wrong is there,just your personal beliefs and you being taught you should believe this way, is this not true. this may be the only outcome for the whole mess. i wanted an explaination for it all and there isnt one is there:)
Common Name
Scientific Name
Haploid no.
Common Name
Scientific Name
Haploid no.
Black bread mould
Aspergillus nidulans
8
House mouse
Mus musculis
20
Broad bean
Vici faba
6
Human
Homo sapiens
23
Cat
Felis doimesticus
19
Jimson weed
Datura stramonium
12
Cattle
Bos Taurus
30
Mosquito
Culex pipiens
3
Chicken
Galus domesticus
39
Mustard plant
Arabidopsis thaliana
5
Chimpanzee
Pan troglodytes
24
Pink bread mould
Neurospora crassa
7
Corn
Zea mays
10
Potato
Solanum tubersom
24
Cotton
Gossypium birsutum
26
Rhesus monkey
Macaca mulatta
21
Dog
Canis familiairis
39
Rice
0ryza sativa
15
Evening primrose
Oenothera biennis
7
Roundworm
Caezoidabditis elegans
6
Frog
Rana pipiens
13
Silkworm
Bombyx mori
28
Fruit fly
Drosopbila melanogaster
4
Slime mould
Dictyostelium discoidium
7
Garden onion
Alliiim cepa
8
Snapdra
so we are as kin to a potatoe as ape.
stanford school of gentics has insight also as to the design of the human chromosome. so how did we evolve from ape, maybe it was the potatoe instead
lloyd pei,origins of humanity 1-8
humm maybe problems there also dna says we were designed, by whom?
time for religion and science to have a long serious talk and consider the otehr side, but evolution is now out of the picture, by modern science and medicine, we mapped the genome
>"what is the most frequented idea of where humans came from"
Scientists are pretty much unanimous that humans evolved from earlier non-human primate species.
>"our chromosome make up says we are a blend of several but none of the others"
I"m not sure what that means. We are not a "blend" of any other species.
>"if this is so there should be no missing link"
If you’re talking about fossils, then this is not true. Fossils are *incredibly* rare. They are not a perfect record of every species that has ever existed. But those fossils we have found show enough of the picture to be absolutely consistent with slow development of species through time.
If you’re not talking about fossils, then I don’t understand what you’re talking about.
>"with no link we suddenly appeared then right"
Wrong. First, there *are* links. Second, even when links are absent from the *fossil* record, that does NOT mean that they never existed.
Even if not a single fossil had ever existed, the DNA evidence alone is enough to establish that humans have a common ancestors with all other living species.
>"or were we made as slaves for visitors from outer space"
If this were true, then there would be no common DNA with the other species.
Now it’s *possible* that some alien species visited earth and genetically modified a subspeices of primates to accelerate or even cause our evolution into what we are now.
But there is no evidence of this. None. So in science we go with the simpler solution … we evolved for the same reason that all other species evolved … natural selection.
—– {edit} —–
>"why do we have a compound chromosome where our relative have none, we have 23 where they have 24 "
Why do you continue to ask more questions, when you show no signs of reading the answers to your first questions?
But to answer your question, you have pointed to one of the biggest bits of evidence in *FAVOR* of evolution … the fact that there are tell-tale signs that our Chromosome #2 is a *fusion* of two separate chromosomes found in the other apes.
>"makes it impossible to interbreed"
No. That’s not why it’s impossible to interbreed! The difference in the *number* of chromosomes is not what makes it impossible to interbreed (or else chimps and gorillas would be able to interbreed as they have the same number … but they can’t). What matters is the *genes* located on the chromosomes, not the *number* of chromosomes.
>"im sorry but there is still conflicting reports of all answers so far"
"All answers"? All two of them? So far there are only *TWO* answers … mine, and Paul B. And we do not conflict at all.
Are you even *READING* our answers?
>"i want to know is the train of thought not what someone has told you to believe"
The only people who have ever "told me what to believe" have been religious people (including my church). I choose to believe some of those things as a matter of faith, and others I reject as simplistic childishness that teaches me nothing of value.
But from the *science* community, NOBODY has "told me what to believe"! In fact, the OPPOSITE. They (the scientific community) have taught me that one should never, ever "believe" *anything* in science! Science is not about belief, but about *understanding*. What matters is not "belief" but *explanations*. And the value of a good explanation hinges on three things … evidence, evidence, and evidence.
>"we are as much kin to cat as we are apes "
??? No. We’re not.
Where do you get "facts" like that?
Even a superficial glance at cats and apes will tell you that we are far more closely related to apes than to cats.
But when you introduce DNA, that closer ‘kin’ relationship to apes than to cats is right there in the DNA sequences!
Bottom line … you are asking valid questions. But you are (A) ignoring people’s answers; and (B) inventing "facts" (like missing links, or that humans a just as much ‘kin’ to cats as to apes) that no biologist accepts.
You cannot understand WHY scientists *overwhelmingly* accept evolution as the best explanation for our origins *based on the current evidence*, if you are inventing evidence on one hand, and ignoring the evidence the scientists are looking at on the other hand.
Scientists are not stupid. If you take some time to just *LISTEN* to what they have to say, instead of pre-judging it to be False, then at least you will understand WHY they accept evolution (even if you still disagree).
secretsauce | Sep 23, 2009
I don’t know if this is a serious Q, but here is a serious answer:
Human evolution:
http://www.becominghuman.org/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_evolu tion#Comparative_table_of_Homo_species
How organisms are related: http://tolweb.org/tree/
For a good up-to-date review of the fossil evidence, see the book Your Inner Fish by Neil Shubin (Prof. Anatomy, U. Chicago). Also Why Evolution is True, by Jerry Coyne, also U Chicago
For fish to land transition, see http://www.devoniantimes.org/
See also the following sites:
Paul B | Sep 23, 2009
Filed under: Uncategorized | Tagged: , 19531953, Brooks Ralph, Buster Budd, Carlson Richard, Carson Robert, Davenport Ned, Dearing Edgar, Dexter Alan, Drake Charles, Eldredge George, Fix Paul, Haupt Whitey, Horror, Johnson Russell, Sawyer Joe, Sci-Fi, Thriller